Hello -
I've got a case where I've built a geometric network on a set of point and line classes. Some of the points are located at line end points but coincident with each other, so one gets connected and one does not. This is what I would expect. What I also expected is that the second point -- the one not get connected -- would appear in the BuildErrors table. Unfortunately its not there. The only points in the BuildErrors table seem to be those clearly offset from a line.
I thought it would be the case than any junction not actually "connected" to a line would be included in the BuildErrors table, and was hoping to use this as a process for subsequent data clean-up. Is this not the case?
Any insights would be much appreciated.
Thank you,
Ed Blair
I've got a case where I've built a geometric network on a set of point and line classes. Some of the points are located at line end points but coincident with each other, so one gets connected and one does not. This is what I would expect. What I also expected is that the second point -- the one not get connected -- would appear in the BuildErrors table. Unfortunately its not there. The only points in the BuildErrors table seem to be those clearly offset from a line.
I thought it would be the case than any junction not actually "connected" to a line would be included in the BuildErrors table, and was hoping to use this as a process for subsequent data clean-up. Is this not the case?
Any insights would be much appreciated.
Thank you,
Ed Blair